Worst transfers of the summer window: who wasted the most money?
Which club wasted the most money in the 2026 summer transfer window: Tottenham's €395m spending spree, Chelsea's overpriced exits, or Arsenal's aging defenders?
A radio-style debate on a real news story, written for A2 learners of English (elementary): simple sentences about familiar topics: prices, travel, work, food, plans.
Hear the whole debate in the app Free every day: today's episode at your level, with a synced transcript and the key vocabulary.
Get it on Google Play iPhone: join the waitlistKey vocabulary
| English | Meaning and example from the episode |
|---|---|
| expensive | costing a lot of money“It is the most expensive.” |
| spending | using money to buy something“He joins Sienna Okafor, who ran the academies at Arsenal and Liverpool and now advises clubs on smart spending versus shortcuts.” |
| output | performance or results produced“What does Enzo's output tell us so far?” |
| defender | player who protects goal from scoring“So they cannot sign a young defender later.” |
| flop | complete failure or unsuccessful person“The fee is wrong, but the player is not a flop.” |
| matchday | day when a sports match is played“I judge the price, not the matchday.” |
| overpay | pay more money than something is worth“That is a big overpay.” |
| squad | group of players on a team“Tonali is a new squad, new system.” |
Who's talking
- Host
- Marcus Webb
Former Premier League scout turned transfer - Sienna Okafor
Former Arsenal and Liverpool academy directo - David Chen
Sports economist and gambling markets analys
The panelists are fictional characters, and their voices are generated with AI.
What they debate
- Is Enzo Fernández at €145m the worst single deal ever made?
- Did Tottenham panic-buy five midfielders instead of one world-class signing?
- How did Chelsea flip Enzo and Rogers for profit while reloading cheaply?
- Did Chelsea actually win twice by selling high on Enzo and Rogers?
Transcript (beginning)
Hello and welcome. So, the summer transfer window closed, and now everyone is asking: who wasted the most money? Enzo Fernández to Manchester City for one hundred forty-five million euros, but he was only the fifteenth-best midfielder at Chelsea. Tottenham spent big on Savio and Sandro Tonali. Arsenal bought aging defenders. Today we ask: which club made the worst deals? And to help us figure that out, we have Marcus Webb, former Premier League scout and transfer analyst who spent fifteen years finding talent across Europe. He joins Sienna Okafor, who ran the academies at Arsenal and Liverpool and now advises clubs on smart spending versus shortcuts. And completing the table, David Chen, a sports economist who tracks transfer money against player performance and where the smart betting money goes.
Marcus, you saw talent for fifteen years across Europe. Is Enzo at one hundred forty-five million euros the worst deal ever?
No, it is not the worst. It is the most expensive. Look, the numbers don't lie here. In three years at Chelsea he was never in the top ten. City paid for a big name.
No, no, wait. The fee is not the problem. The wage is. City now pay a huge salary for years. So they cannot sign a young defender later. That is the real damage.
David, you measure waste with numbers. What does Enzo's output tell us so far?
The salary point is small. City sell players every summer, so they always find money for a young defender. My problem is the output. Number fifteen, then seven, then nine. That is a big overpay.
They sell the academy kids, David. That is the cost.
No, no, wait. Ranking is not the point. Enzo plays deep, City need a passer. The profile fits. The fee is wrong, but the player is not a flop.
Continue listening: 28 more turns The full episode, with the transcript synced to the audio, is in the RoundTalk app.
Get it on Google Play iPhone: join the waitlist